240hz monitor user experience with sub 240hz content?
网页2010年5月10日 — Competitive disadvantage. (B) Very low input lag if you keep the monitor at max Hz, then frame rates far below Hz has lag benefits compared to a lower-Hz monitor. For example, Fortnite and CS:GO 100 fps at 240Hz is much lower latency than 100fps at 144Hz. Whether you are using VSYNC OFF or variable refresh rate.
165Hz vs 240Hz - [H]ard|Forum
网页2023年9月8日 — I'd say 240 Hz is a good limit right now and for several years more. I'm using a 4090 with a 4K 144 Hz display and a lot of games, especially slightly older ones can go above 144 Hz, but few above 240. The latest and greatest tech extravaganzas might just barely hit 120 fps if frame generation is supported and path tracing is not involved.
Samsung Odyssey: 49" 5120x1440, 240 Hz, HDR1000 - [H]ard|Forum
网页2008年8月25日 — For 2020 Samsung is releasing an upgraded version of their 49" CRG9. They claim 1ms response time and 240 Hz refresh rate, with a super curved 1000R curve. CRG9 is 1800R for reference. The stand seems to be a color swapped version of the CRG9 stand and in terms of overall design the only update is the screen portion.
Odyssey Neo G8 - 4K 240 Hz 32" Quantum Mini LED
网页4K/240 Hz/10-BPC RGB, G-Sync enabled plus the check box below it "Enable Settings for the selected display model" RPG picture mode HDR on Windows 11, full brightness on monitor (one of the rare monitors you can adjust screen brightness in HDR mode)
BenQ XL2746S - 240 Hz 0.5ms DyAc+ with FreeSync/GSync
网页2005年8月1日 — While $700 is a tall ask for a 1080p 240 hz monitor in the year 2020, this was totally worth it for me and my use case (FPS games like warzone/apex). DyAc+ is SUPER bright and the motion reminds me of my old Sony FW900 except w/sharper visuals.
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 4K 240 Hz OLED - [H]ard|Forum
网页2024年1月12日 — If we remove price however I believe the top-tier mini-LED flagship performs slightly better overall. I would say the AW32 OLED graded on PURE PERFORMANCE is about 85-90% of the mini-LEDs above. Of course the above is my subjective opinion and YMMV. I tested these monitors side-by-side for almost 4-5 hrs.
Asus PG27AQDP 1440p 480Hz WOLED - [H]ard|Forum
网页2012年7月5日 — While it might be possible to make these video modes available it would be quite problematic for advertising such monitor and all supported video modes would need to be tested and validated. It is simpler to just use standard speeds and when possible when DP 2.1 is more available make native 4K at 480Hz, maybe next year.
after 240 hz 144 feels like a slide show - [H]ard|Forum
网页2010年12月18日 — I'd say sufferable if you dont have better available - yet greatly inferior to a modern full featured (high hz, VRR) gaming monitor at higher frame rates. Soon, relatively, even 4k will have 120hz native or better (even on oled the gen after this with better hdmi), and combined with true 1000nit hdr with oled or fald.
PG27AQDM 240hz OLED vs PG27AQM 360Hz IPS for competative …
网页2022年7月26日 — The AQN has a 3.55ms blur edge time (BET), while the AQDM has a 3.30ms BET. Your 0.5ms 270Hz 8.0 panel won't be far from 4.5ms either. However, with 360Hz, you don't need to worry about stuttering or input lag when the extra frames go beyond 240Hz without the need to cap FPS.
Dual monitor setup, one for 240hz 24" fps gaming, the other a …
网页2020年5月13日 — My guess is that the 240hz monitor will provide a better experience to hardcore first person shooter players, simply due to the additional information afforded from the higher refresh. As far as response time goes, though, LG's OLED TVs @ 120hz are right there with the fastest gaming monitors in terms of input lag.
- 某些结果已被删除